Skip to content

Manage a Feedback Item

You will know what to look for on a single feedback item and how to move it forward cleanly. The triage page covers the queue as a whole; this page covers what happens once you click into a single item.

Every Lens item carries a consistent set of fields. Knowing which fields are static context and which are working state is the easiest way to avoid editing the wrong thing.

FieldDescriptionEditable
Page or routeThe URL the reviewer was on when they submitted the item.No
EnvironmentWhich environment the feedback was submitted against.No
ScreenshotThe captured view at submission time.No
Reviewer noteThe original comment the reviewer left.No
Submitted atTimestamp of the original submission.No
StatusWhere the item is in the workflow.Yes
AssigneeThe person currently responsible for the item.Yes
CommentsFollow-up discussion, decisions, and links to related work.Yes (append only)
Activity logAutomatic history of status changes and edits.No

A single item moves through a small number of states. The full state machine is described on Lens status workflow; the tabs below cover what actually happens at each state from the perspective of the person responsible for the item.

The item has just arrived and no one has claimed it. Your job here is to read the reviewer note, look at the screenshot, and decide whether the item is actionable.

  • Confirm the environment matches what you expect.
  • Confirm the page context makes sense.
  • If the item is clearly a duplicate of an existing one, leave a comment linking the original and close it.
  • If the item is actionable, assign it and move it to in progress.
  • If the item is not actionable, dismiss it with a comment explaining why.

These are the habits that make individual items easy to read months after they are filed.

  • Add comments whenever the next action is not obvious from the current state.
  • Move status deliberately rather than leaving everything in the default.
  • Reassign explicitly when ownership changes, even within the same triage session.
  • Delete an item only when it is truly noise or was created in error. Closed items are almost always more useful than deleted ones, because they preserve the discussion.
  • Keep comments self-contained. A future reader should not need access to chat history or a meeting to follow what happened.
  • Every active item has a clear next state and a clear owner.
  • The item history is enough to explain what changed and when, without checking other tools.
  • Closed items are easy to find later because their final comment names the outcome.
  • Reviewers trust that filing a Lens item is worth the effort, because they see items being acted on.